The moment we’ve all been waiting for? The Pendulum critique

By Michael Bodley

The University of South Carolina at Aiken’s Peggy Elliott led the breakout critique session of the Oct. 23 issue of the Pendulum, or the “Chikin Iz Back” one. And she had some problems with its design.

Much of what Elliott had to say led back to one of the “design commandments” reinforced and harped on throughout the conference. In print, if a dollar bill can be laid on a page and cover nothing but text, that needs to be adjusted.

And if we choose to adhere to this rule, we’re going to need to make some adjustments, because Elliott could fit that dollar bill on most every page.

More broadly speaking, though, Elliot and SPJ Board Member Michael Koretzky both suggested we take more risks, be more bold. Better to be too big and too risky than to fall short.

EDIT: Misspelled Koretzky’s last name in the original post. Humble apologies for a bad error.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “The moment we’ve all been waiting for? The Pendulum critique

  1. Accepted. Actually, it’s still spelled wrong on my own dam paycheck. Luckily, Bank of America doesn’t check.

    This blog is fairly awesome, by the way. Even when it rips on me. Especially when it rips on me.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s